Prevalence, Knowledge and Perceptions of Smoking and Tobacco Products and Vape Among SEPAR Members.

Introduction: The professional dedicated to respiratory health has an exemplary role in tobacco control, promoting smoking cessation in their patients. However, multiple circumstances cause a low implementation. Therefore, the objective of the study is to identify the consumption, knowledge and perception of tobacco and its emerging products in a representative sample of professionals involved in the treatment of respiratory patients integrated into the Spanish Society of Pneumology and Thoracic Surgery (SEPAR). Methods: Descriptive analysis of a structured online interview addressed to 5340 SEPAR members. Results: In a sample of 802 respondents, more than 33% have smoked at some time and 6.6% continue to smoke. More than 66% consider smoking as a chronic disease. More than 90% consider their role model important and advise their patients to quit smoking, but less than half carry out a smoking intervention. Only 35% of them believe that the ban on smoking in health centers is always complied. More than 75% do not consider nicotine delivery devices an option for smoking cessation or harm reduction. 22% are unaware of water pipes and 29% of heated tobacco. Conclusions: Professionals specialized in respiratory diseases are highly sensitized to smoking. Despite this, there are still weak points such as the insufficient implementation of smoking cessation interventions or the scant training in smoking and in new emerging products.

Introducción: El profesional dedicado a la salud respiratoria tiene un papel ejemplar en el control del tabaquismo, promoviendo el abandono del hábito tabáquico en sus pacientes. Sin embargo, múltiples circunstancias provocan una baja implementación. Por tanto, el objetivo del estudio es identificar el consumo, el conocimiento y la percepción sobre el tabaco y sus productos emergentes en una muestra representativa de profesionales implicados en el tratamiento de pacientes respiratorios integrados en la Sociedad Española de Neumología y Cirugía Torácica (SEPAR). Métodos: Análisis descriptivo de una entrevista estructurada en línea dirigida a 5.340 miembros de la SEPAR. Resultados: En una muestra de 802 encuestados, más del 33% ha fumado alguna vez y el 6.6% sigue fumando. Más del 66% considera el tabaquismo como una enfermedad crónica. Más del 90% considera importante su modelo a seguir y aconseja a sus pacientes que dejen de fumar, pero menos de la mitad realiza una intervención para dejar de fumar. Solo el 35% de ellos cree que la prohibición de fumar en los centros de salud se cumple siempre. Más del 75% no considera que los dispositivos de suministro de nicotina sean una opción para dejar de fumar o reducir los daños. El 22% desconoce las pipas de agua y el 29% el tabaco calentado. Conclusiones: Los profesionales especialistas en enfermedades respiratorias están altamente sensibilizados al tabaquismo. A pesar de ello, aún existen puntos débiles como la insuficiente implantación de intervenciones para dejar de fumar o la escasa formación en tabaquismo y en nuevos productos emergentes.

Relación entre la autoeficacia para dejar de fumar, la voluntad propia y quién envía a los pacientes / Relationship between self-efficacy to quit smoking, own will and who referred patients

Objetivo: Comprobar si el grado de autoeficacia (AE) para dejar de fumar es diferente según quién remita al fumador a la consulta de tabaquismo y evaluar si el grado de AE medida según procedencia tiene impacto en el resultado (éxito o fracaso). Método: Estudio observacional, longitudinal (cohorte prospectiva), multicéntrico, en consultas para dejar de fumar de España y Argentina. Para valorar la motivación, fueron utilizados test cuantitativos (Richmond, Henry Mondor de Paris y Khimji Watts) y una escala semicuantitativa. La AE se midió con una pregunta de dos cuestionarios distintos (pregunta 4 del cuestionario de Richmond y pregunta 3 del cuestionario de Khimji-Watts). El análisis estadístico incluyó modelos descriptivos, de asociación y de regresión. Resultados: Muestra de 182 sujetos (90 [49,5%] mujeres, edad media 51,4 años [DE: 11; IC 26-77]). Con la pregunta 3 de AE del test Khimji-Watts se encontró asociación con la procedencia en los varones: acudir por voluntad propia incrementa la AE frente a los que acuden enviados desde atención primaria o desde otras especialidades. Ninguna de las variables de AE presentó asociación con el resultado en dejar de fumar, pero las mujeres que acudieron por voluntad propia o enviadas desde atención primaria tienen más probabilidades de dejar de fumar. Los varones procedentes de otras especialidades y con edades medias tienen más probabilidades de fracaso. Conclusiones: Los varones que acuden a dejar de fumar por voluntad propia presentan puntuaciones más altas de AE que aquellos que acuden enviados por atención primaria y otras especialidades. No hemos encontrado una mayor abstinencia final según la puntuación de AE y la procedencia.(AU)

Objective: To check whether the degree of self-efficacy to quit smoking is different depending on who refers the smoker to the smoking cessation clinics, considering as origin: primary care, from another medical specialist or by the patient’s own volition, and to assess whether the degree of self-efficacy measured by who refers the patient has an impact on the ­outcome (success or failure). Methods: Observational, longitudinal (prospective cohort), multicentre study in smoking cessation clinics in Spain and Argentina (daily clinical practice). Quantitative tests (Richmond, Henry Mondor de Paris and Khimji Watts) and one semiquantitative test were used to assess motivation. Self-efficacy was measured with one question from two different questionnaires (question 4 of the Richmond questionnaire and question 3 of the Khimji-Watts questionnaire). Statistical analysis included descriptive, association, and regression models. Results: 182 subjects [90 (49.5%) women, mean age 51.4 years (11; 25-77)]. With question three of the auto-efficacy of the Khimji-Watts test an association was found with the origin in men: attending of their own free will increases self-efficacy compared to those who attend sent from primary care or from other specialties. None of the self-efficacy variables was associated with the outcome of quitting smoking, but women who attended of their own free will or referred from primary care are more likely to quit smoking. Men from other specialties and with middle ages are more likely to fail. Conclusions: Men referred for QS by his OV have higher SE scores (KWT3 question) than those referred by PC and OS. We did not find a higher final abstinence according to SE score and source.(AU)

La notoriedad de la salud respiratoria y de los profesionales sanitarios que la cuidan / Raising awareness of respiratory health and specialists in respiratory diseases

No disponible

[Translated article] Raising awareness of respiratory health and specialists in respiratory diseases / La notoriedad de la salud respiratoria y de los profesionales sanitarios que la cuidan

No disponible

Tobacco as a Source of Microplastics. Tobacco and Environment: World No Tobacco Day 2022 / El tabaco como fuente de microplásticos. Tabaco y medioambiente: Día mundial sin tabaco 2022

No disponible

[Positioning Document of Spanish Society of Pulmonology and Thoracic Surgery (SEPAR) on Tobacco Harm Reduction Strategies]. / Documento de posicionamiento de la Sociedad Española de Neumología y Cirugía Torácica (SEPAR) ante las estrategias de reducción del daño del tabaco.

In the last decade, the appearance of electronic cigarettes and new tobacco products (heated tobacco or smokeless tobacco) has generated a growing interest in harm reduction methods that are defined as mechanisms that seek to reduce the harmful consequences of tobacco without give up the pleasant effects of it by replacing it with these new electronic devices. However, these products are addictive and not safe as they contain nicotine. Harm reduction is a false solution as it represents a commercial strategy of the tobacco industry to increase its sales, making it difficult to control smoking, since it keeps smokers from consuming tobacco and prevents them from making serious attempts to quit. In addition, these products are a gateway to adolescents in tobacco.

[COVID-19 and Smoking: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Evidence]. / COVID-19 y tabaquismo: revisión sistemática y metaanálisis de la evidencia.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine if tobacco use in patients with Covid-19 is associated with a negative disease course and adverse outcome, and if smoking, current and past, is associated with a greater possibility of developing COVID-19. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A systematic review (SR) and meta-analysis (MA) of previously published works were performed. The search strategy included all known descriptors for Covid-19 and tobacco and was conducted in different databases. Appropriate statistical models were used to address the effect size in meta-analysis, namely random effects and fixed effects model. RESULTS: Thirty-four articles were identified in the SR of which 19 were included in the MA. Being a smoker or former smoker was shown to be a risk factor for worse progression of Covid-19 infection (OR 1.96, 95% CI, 1.36 - 2.83) and a greater probability of presenting a more critical condition (OR 1.79 95% CI, 1.19 - 2.70). As limitations of the MA, we found that most of the studies analyzed were observational with limited publication bias. Two studies that disagreed with the rest were included, although after withdrawing them from the MA, smoking was maintained as a risk factor for worse progress. CONCLUSION: Current and past smoking produces a more serious clinical form of Covid-19 and more frequently leads to intensive care admission, intubation, and death.

Is the motivation to quit smoking a predictor of abstinence maintenance?

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to explore the utility of measuring motivation to quit smoking as a predictor of abstinence maintenance among smokers who wanted to quit and who were included in a multicenter study conducted in daily clinical practice. METHODS: This observational, longitudinal (prospective cohort), multicenter study was conducted in smoking clinics in Spain and the Argentine Republic in daily clinical practice. Motivation was assessed using three quantitative motivation tests and a Visual Analogue Scale. Statistical analysis included descriptive, association measures and logistic regression models. RESULTS: Of a total of 404 subjects, 273 were ultimately included for analysis (147 women; 53.8%), mean age 51±11 years). In one year, 53.5% (36.13% by intention to treat) of subjects (146) were successful in quitting smoking [men: 45.2% (66) and women: 54.8% (80)], with no differences between sexes. None of the scales utilized was associated, in an unquestionable or direct way, with long-term abstinence, although three of them, in a very complex model, with additional variables and added interactions, were associated with the 'result' variable, when other variables intervened in certain circumstances. CONCLUSIONS: None of the analyzed motivational scales alone demonstrated an association with success or failure in quitting smoking; thus, their use in isolation is of no value. Some of the scales analyzed might be related to the maintenance of abstinence but in complex models where other variables intervene, which makes interpretation considerably difficult. Therefore, the predictive capacity of the tests analyzed, based on the models, was low.

WITHDRAWN: Reply to "Smoker, Former Smoker and COVID-19: Nicotine Does Not Protect Against SARS-CoV-2"

This article has been withdrawn at the request of the author(s) and/or editor. The Publisher apologizes for any inconvenience this may cause. The full Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal can be found at https://www.elsevier.com/about/our-business/policies/article-withdrawal

Respuesta a "Fumador, exfumador y COVID-19" / Reply to "Smoker, Former Smoker and COVID-19"

No disponible

Certified Smoking Cessation Units in Spain: High Potential for Detection of Undiagnosed Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Profile of Newly Diagnosed Cases.

PURPOSE: Smokers attending smoking cessation units (SCUs) may offer a unique opportunity for early recognition of undiagnosed chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We aimed at assessing the impact of SCUs on the early diagnosis of COPD and describing the clinical and smoking profile of newly-diagnosed COPD cases at SCUs certified by the Spanish Society of Respiratory Diseases and Thoracic Surgery (SEPAR). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A multicenter cross-sectional observational cohort study (DIPREPOQ study) was performed in eight SEPAR-certified SCUs in Spain. Adult current smokers with no previously diagnosed respiratory disease and having one o more respiratory symptoms were included. Lung functional tests were performed and previously undiagnosed COPD cases were identified and characterized based on national guidelines. RESULTS: Out of 401 individuals newly attending the SCUs, 252 participants were included and 73 (28.9%) met the definition of previously undiagnosed COPD. A characterization of patients with COPD being newly recognized in SCUs showed: age (mean±SD) 61±9 years; men 59%; active work status 53.1%; functional class I/II dyspnea 82.8%, GOLD state mild/moderate/severe 57%/31%/12%; non-exacerbators 90%, CAT 14±4; emphysema in X-rays 40%. Most common co-morbidities were cardiovascular and psychiatric (anxiety and depression) ones. Usual smoking history included a lengthy smoking history (41±9 years) and a current consumption of 24±9 cigarettes/day. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Consistently certified SCUs can have a substantial contribution to early diagnosis of COPD. A typical profile of newly detected cases is reported, with most patients being men at their early sixties, with mild symptoms and with high and lengthy smoking history. Our study reports a high usefulness of lung functional tests to detect undiagnosed COPD in appropriately selected participants attending SCUs at a large national scale, using a standardized methodology. This is likely to be facilitated by the certification of SCUs using well-defined requirements by national scientific societies.

¿Salir a fumar fuera de un ambiente cerrado es suficiente para evitar el tabaquismo de segunda y tercera mano? / Is Smoking Outside an Enclosed Space Enough to Prevent Second and Third-Hand Exposure?

No disponible